![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Teaching about energy and energy transfer Mike Evans and Linda Ellis Introduction Things change because of differences. Richard Boohan and Jon Ogborn argue that having energy does not make things change, rather that we need to think about the differences between things to explain change. Differences might be in:
A teaching model used by physicist Richard Feynman (see A model for the principle of energy transfer) involves thinking about energy as a series of units, like a child's bricks. Energy is transferred within and between systems, some ending up in one location while others end up in another. It is an easy step from this to Sankey diagrams. In the classroom money or chocolate buttons are often used as the units of energy. These tokens represent the transfer of energy and can help to explain why a bulb in a circuit does not use up current. The current acts as an energy carrier. Indeed, money is a good analogy to use, since money itself is a token. Along with this notion of energy there is a set of associated language. In this model of energy the energy is transferred from one place to another. Energy is located in particular positions. We speak of:
The important aspect here is that energy is in a particular location and we do not talk about types of energy. An alternative and often-used model is to think about energy in terms of different forms. In this model you will need to talk about energy being transformed from one type of energy into another. It is quite wrong to use the term 'transfer' here.We will need to talk of energy being transformed from chemical energy in the battery to electrical energy in the wires, and to light energy in the bulb. We do not use the term 'transfer' here - it doesn't make sense. If we adopt this view of energy, it is hard to develop adequate teaching models (visualisations) to explain what is happening in any change. This way of looking at energy can suggest that there is something magical going on as one form changes into another. Throughout school science and beyond a mixture of these two approaches has been used, and not in consistent ways. Sometimes talking about electrical energy or light energy is helpful 'shorthand'. However, there is a need to build on a firm base. How well do pupils and adults understand the concept of energy? How well are individuals able to use their view of energy to explain a range of everyday phenomena? Energy conservation is the key concept that underpins our ability to track changes, account for what is happening and to make predictions. Twelve-year-olds can cope with this idea, but they do not readily understand it, since it is probably the most abstract idea we have in science. Understanding comes through practice. Encouraging students to use the idea of energy transfer and conservation to track changes and to explain what is happening provides that practice. Why not, for instance, consider the energy transfers taking place using Sankey diagrams for photosynthesis and compare with a photovoltaic cell? Which is most efficient? The elements towards building this story are given below. They are not necessarily in an order for teaching, since it is more efficient and effective to build the model as suggested by Feynmann. This roots the idea in a 'visualisation', or teaching model, which can then be used to track what is happening in a number of changes.
Because energy is an accounting system, the notion of energy transfer is best taught before energy sources. This then provides students with access to a wider range of models they can apply to help develop understanding, for example in electric circuits. |